Getting remote M&E right: ethics, challenges and gaps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/459af/459afe8c45397e165de0bfcc51a7bf1ab92d2a24" alt=""
This paper from ALNAP explores some of the implications of the rapid shift towards remote M&E, drawing on reflections from a series of M&E Skills-Building Workshops for humanitarian M&E practitioners hosted in February and March 2021. It summariszes five key areas where there are ethical issues, challenges, gaps and limitations with remote M&E, and highlights emerging good practice. Read more here.
You might also like
-
Meet us (virtually!) at RightsCon next week
-
Getting Real About Artificial Intelligence: GenAI, Evaluation in International Development, and the Case for Caution
-
Key takeaways from our first Gender, AI and MERL Working Group meeting
-
What are the potential benefits, considerations, and risks of AI for Research Funding Organisations (RFOs)?