MERL Tech State of the Field Series

MERL Tech State of the Field Series


The year 2020 was a compelling time to look back and pull together lessons from the past five years of convening hundreds of monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning and technology practitioners who have joined us as part of the MERL Tech community. The global COVID-19 pandemic had recently struck, and there was an urgent need to know what was happening, where, and to what extent. Data has been a critical piece of COVID-19 responses — it can mean the difference between life and death. And technology use grew due to stay-at-home orders and a push for “remote monitoring” and data collection from a distance.

At the same time, we saw global calls for justice reach a tipping point in the wake of decades of racist and colonial systems operating at the level of nations, institutions, organizations, the global aid and development systems, and the tech sector. There is no denying that these power dynamics and systems have shaped the MERL Tech space as well.

Moments of crisis tend to test a field, and we live in extreme times. The coming decade will demand a nimble, adaptive, fair, and just use of data for managing complexity and for gaining longer-term understanding of change and impact. Perhaps most importantly, in 2020 and beyond, we need meaningful involvement of stakeholders at every level and openness to a re-shaping of our sector and its relationships and power dynamics.

In this time of upheaval and change we released a set of four papers that aimed to take stock of the field from 2014-2019 as launchpad for shaping the future of MERL Tech. In September 2018, the papers’ authors began reviewing the past five years of MERL Tech events to identify lessons, trends, and issues in this rapidly changing field. They also reviewed the literature base to determine what we know, what we yet need to understand about technology in MERL, and what are the gaps in the formal literature. No longer is this a nascent field, yet it is one that is fast paced and constantly shifting with the advent of new technologies. We have learned many lessons over the past five years, but complex political, technical, and ethical questions remain.

Through these papers, we aimed to describe the State of the Field up to 2019 and to offer a baseline point in time from which the wider MERL Tech community could take action to make the next phase of MERL Tech development effective, responsible, ethical, just, and equitable. We share these papers as conversation pieces and hope they will generate more discussion in the MERL Tech space about where to go from here.